https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175673 The court dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the learned single judge's decision that the appellant had no locus standi to file the writ petition. The court emphasized that private banking companies, like the second respondent, are not typically subject to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 unless there is a clear statutory violation. The appellant failed to demonstrate any statutory non-compliance or personal grievance, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition and closure of related applications. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:28:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175673 The court dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the learned single judge's decision that the appellant had no locus standi to file the writ petition. The court emphasized that private banking companies, like the second respondent, are not typically subject to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 unless there is a clear statutory violation. The appellant failed to demonstrate any statutory non-compliance or personal grievance, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition and closure of related applications. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175673