https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175670 The appeal before the CESTAT MUMBAI was successful as the appellate Commissioner was found to have exceeded jurisdiction by remanding the case instead of deciding on merits. The issue of unjust enrichment was raised, with the Tribunal noting contradictions in the Commissioner's order and ordering a fresh decision with better application of mind. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed for a remand to ensure the appellants' right to be heard. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:59:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175670 The appeal before the CESTAT MUMBAI was successful as the appellate Commissioner was found to have exceeded jurisdiction by remanding the case instead of deciding on merits. The issue of unjust enrichment was raised, with the Tribunal noting contradictions in the Commissioner's order and ordering a fresh decision with better application of mind. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed for a remand to ensure the appellants' right to be heard. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175670