<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 116 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268812</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and recovery proceedings for the assessment year 2008-09. The Court directed the petitioner to pay the outstanding demand partially, following various appeals and applications related to international transactions and Arm&#039;s Length price adjustments. Despite the petitioner&#039;s stay application being partially granted by the Tribunal, subsequent developments and rectification applications led to revised assessment orders. The Court emphasized the need for a prima facie case for granting stay applications and denied relief due to the absence of errors in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 116 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268812</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and recovery proceedings for the assessment year 2008-09. The Court directed the petitioner to pay the outstanding demand partially, following various appeals and applications related to international transactions and Arm&#039;s Length price adjustments. Despite the petitioner&#039;s stay application being partially granted by the Tribunal, subsequent developments and rectification applications led to revised assessment orders. The Court emphasized the need for a prima facie case for granting stay applications and denied relief due to the absence of errors in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>