https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268811 The court condoned a 277-day delay in refiling the appeal and allowed rectification of a deficiency in court fee. The appellant's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging unexplained cash deposits of &8377; 12,12,000 was dismissed. The court upheld the authorities' findings that the deposits were unexplained despite the appellant's explanations based on land sale and boutique profits. The court found no merit in the appeal as the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the cash deposits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:15:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268811 The court condoned a 277-day delay in refiling the appeal and allowed rectification of a deficiency in court fee. The appellant's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging unexplained cash deposits of &8377; 12,12,000 was dismissed. The court upheld the authorities' findings that the deposits were unexplained despite the appellant's explanations based on land sale and boutique profits. The court found no merit in the appeal as the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the cash deposits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268811