<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 113 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268809</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to grant a partial waiver of interest by reducing it to 75% under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act. Despite acknowledging genuine hardship faced by the petitioner, the court emphasized the need for finality in long-standing litigations, directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 75,000 towards interest to settle the matter conclusively. The judgment clarified the authority&#039;s discretion to reduce or waive interest based on the circumstances without being obligated to grant a complete waiver, considering the undue hardship that demanding the full interest amount would impose on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:15:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 113 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268809</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to grant a partial waiver of interest by reducing it to 75% under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act. Despite acknowledging genuine hardship faced by the petitioner, the court emphasized the need for finality in long-standing litigations, directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 75,000 towards interest to settle the matter conclusively. The judgment clarified the authority&#039;s discretion to reduce or waive interest based on the circumstances without being obligated to grant a complete waiver, considering the undue hardship that demanding the full interest amount would impose on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>