<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to verify and allow the interest paid on borrowed funds for land acquisition as part of the cost. Other claims for administrative expenses and improvement costs were disallowed due to lack of substantiation and relevance. The Tribunal emphasized treating expenditure under the Joint Development Agreement as business expenditure, not an improvement cost of the capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to verify and allow the interest paid on borrowed funds for land acquisition as part of the cost. Other claims for administrative expenses and improvement costs were disallowed due to lack of substantiation and relevance. The Tribunal emphasized treating expenditure under the Joint Development Agreement as business expenditure, not an improvement cost of the capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>