<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268796</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 1,80,420 for unexplained silver acquisition but accepting the explanation for 12 kgs of silver. The decision considered factors such as family background, societal norms, and historical silver rates. The appeal was partly allowed on 4th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268796</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 1,80,420 for unexplained silver acquisition but accepting the explanation for 12 kgs of silver. The decision considered factors such as family background, societal norms, and historical silver rates. The appeal was partly allowed on 4th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>