<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified its earlier order, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the fair market value of the property as of the dissolution date. The rectification aligned the decision with legal principles outlined by the Apex Court, emphasizing the importance of valuing assets at market value for accurate computation of capital gains. The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting relief based on the corrected valuation approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified its earlier order, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the fair market value of the property as of the dissolution date. The rectification aligned the decision with legal principles outlined by the Apex Court, emphasizing the importance of valuing assets at market value for accurate computation of capital gains. The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting relief based on the corrected valuation approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>