https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268776 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they were not liable for the Service Tax demand concerning the amount charged by the foreign bank from ING Vyasa Bank. The decision was based on the lack of evidence demonstrating direct charges to the appellant, the acknowledgment of ING Vyasa Bank as the recipient of services, and a previous favorable order for the appellant. As a result, the appeal was granted, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268776 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they were not liable for the Service Tax demand concerning the amount charged by the foreign bank from ING Vyasa Bank. The decision was based on the lack of evidence demonstrating direct charges to the appellant, the acknowledgment of ING Vyasa Bank as the recipient of services, and a previous favorable order for the appellant. As a result, the appeal was granted, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268776