https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268773 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible for Cenvat credit for services used in paying tax liability under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. The services provided by insurance agents were taxable, while the appellant's life insurance services were tax-exempt. The Tribunal found that the services in question did not qualify as input services for any taxable output service provided by the appellant. Therefore, the appellant's appeal was rejected, emphasizing the necessity of complying with the applicable rules and provisions to determine tax credit eligibility and liabilities. en-us Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:42:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268773 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible for Cenvat credit for services used in paying tax liability under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. The services provided by insurance agents were taxable, while the appellant's life insurance services were tax-exempt. The Tribunal found that the services in question did not qualify as input services for any taxable output service provided by the appellant. Therefore, the appellant's appeal was rejected, emphasizing the necessity of complying with the applicable rules and provisions to determine tax credit eligibility and liabilities. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268773