<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on all three issues. It set aside the confirmation of demands related to transformer oil credit, penalty imposition for delayed return of goods from the job worker, and denial of credit based on unsigned invoices. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on all three issues. It set aside the confirmation of demands related to transformer oil credit, penalty imposition for delayed return of goods from the job worker, and denial of credit based on unsigned invoices. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>