<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 63 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for modification of the stay order concerning the classification of imported coal as &quot;bituminous coal&quot; or &quot;steam coal.&quot; The appellants&#039; request for a waiver of pre-deposit based on financial hardship and reliance on interim orders from other benches was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized that modifying the order on new grounds would constitute impermissible review. The appellants were directed to comply with the pre-deposit order within four weeks. The decision underscored that financial hardship, not raised during the initial stay order, could not be considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:28:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 63 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for modification of the stay order concerning the classification of imported coal as &quot;bituminous coal&quot; or &quot;steam coal.&quot; The appellants&#039; request for a waiver of pre-deposit based on financial hardship and reliance on interim orders from other benches was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized that modifying the order on new grounds would constitute impermissible review. The appellants were directed to comply with the pre-deposit order within four weeks. The decision underscored that financial hardship, not raised during the initial stay order, could not be considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>