<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 57 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268753</link>
    <description>A Commissioner (Appeals) direction to reassess a Bill of Entry on the declared value was found prima facie unsustainable because no basis was recorded for treating that declared value as the correct assessable value. The absence of reasoning rendered the direction a non-speaking order for interim purposes, and that deficiency justified protection against its immediate operation. The reassessment direction was therefore stayed pending further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 57 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268753</link>
      <description>A Commissioner (Appeals) direction to reassess a Bill of Entry on the declared value was found prima facie unsustainable because no basis was recorded for treating that declared value as the correct assessable value. The absence of reasoning rendered the direction a non-speaking order for interim purposes, and that deficiency justified protection against its immediate operation. The reassessment direction was therefore stayed pending further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>