https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268752 Penalty was not interfered with because the Revenue failed to establish any specific omission or commission by the respondent-company justifying the substantial penalty. The Tribunal also noted that a civil court had found no fault with the respondent and that the record did not show any demonstrated prejudice to the Revenue. On that factual and evidentiary basis, the penalty order was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268752 Penalty was not interfered with because the Revenue failed to establish any specific omission or commission by the respondent-company justifying the substantial penalty. The Tribunal also noted that a civil court had found no fault with the respondent and that the record did not show any demonstrated prejudice to the Revenue. On that factual and evidentiary basis, the penalty order was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268752