<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 54 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reexamination of evidences provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case and directed the adjudicating authority to review all documents, including Bills of Entry and a comparative chart. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant evidences in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 54 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reexamination of evidences provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case and directed the adjudicating authority to review all documents, including Bills of Entry and a comparative chart. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant evidences in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>