<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268748</link>
    <description>Transport of goods into the State without valid, genuine supporting documents justified penalty where the vehicle was intercepted at the check post, the invoices and related papers were found to be not genuine, and the transporter could not produce consignor confirmation. The authorities treated the case as transport without prescribed documents at the time of entry, and the revisional court found no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to interfere with the penalty order. The penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268748</link>
      <description>Transport of goods into the State without valid, genuine supporting documents justified penalty where the vehicle was intercepted at the check post, the invoices and related papers were found to be not genuine, and the transporter could not produce consignor confirmation. The authorities treated the case as transport without prescribed documents at the time of entry, and the revisional court found no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to interfere with the penalty order. The penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>