<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 51 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268747</link>
    <description>The writ petitions were disposed of by applying the operative portion of an earlier common judgment on the same issues, and the court did not undertake any independent adjudication on the merits. The petitions were therefore concluded in line with that prior determination, while other questions raised by the petitioners were left undecided and were not addressed in the disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 51 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268747</link>
      <description>The writ petitions were disposed of by applying the operative portion of an earlier common judgment on the same issues, and the court did not undertake any independent adjudication on the merits. The petitions were therefore concluded in line with that prior determination, while other questions raised by the petitioners were left undecided and were not addressed in the disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>