<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1143 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175657</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow set off of 10A unit losses against business profits, dismissed the issue of write off of loans given to employees as a factual finding, rejected questions on the computation of interest liabilities under Section 234B and 234C, and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision on the amendment to Explanation 1 to section 234B and 234C as clarificatory and not erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1143 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175657</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow set off of 10A unit losses against business profits, dismissed the issue of write off of loans given to employees as a factual finding, rejected questions on the computation of interest liabilities under Section 234B and 234C, and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision on the amendment to Explanation 1 to section 234B and 234C as clarificatory and not erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>