<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1307</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on capital goods was admissible where duty-paid goods were received under proper duty-paying documents and satisfied the statutory conditions for credit. The recipient could not be denied credit merely because the supplier or job worker had paid duty on a valuation that the recipient authorities considered incorrect, since they could not reassess that assessable value at the recipient&#039;s end. Credit was therefore allowed and denial of Modvat credit was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1307</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on capital goods was admissible where duty-paid goods were received under proper duty-paying documents and satisfied the statutory conditions for credit. The recipient could not be denied credit merely because the supplier or job worker had paid duty on a valuation that the recipient authorities considered incorrect, since they could not reassess that assessable value at the recipient&#039;s end. Credit was therefore allowed and denial of Modvat credit was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>