<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 81 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the 5% royalty payment was not required to be added to the assessable value of imported components as it was not directly related to the imported goods but to the finished products for sale in India and export. The Tribunal concluded that the royalty payment did not influence the invoice price and should be considered part of the transaction value. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was set aside based on the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(c) and the agreements between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 81 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the 5% royalty payment was not required to be added to the assessable value of imported components as it was not directly related to the imported goods but to the finished products for sale in India and export. The Tribunal concluded that the royalty payment did not influence the invoice price and should be considered part of the transaction value. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was set aside based on the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(c) and the agreements between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>