<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exemptions Initially Denied Due to Capitation Fees, Later Allowed as Section 13 Provisions Were Not Applied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26182</link>
    <description>Non-granting of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) - denial of benefits of exemption u/s. 11 also - the exemption has been denied solely for the reason that the institution has received the capitation fees. - There is not even a whisper in the orders of the authorities below which could suggest that the facts of the case are hit by the provisions of Sec. 13 - exemption allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:54:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exemptions Initially Denied Due to Capitation Fees, Later Allowed as Section 13 Provisions Were Not Applied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26182</link>
      <description>Non-granting of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) - denial of benefits of exemption u/s. 11 also - the exemption has been denied solely for the reason that the institution has received the capitation fees. - There is not even a whisper in the orders of the authorities below which could suggest that the facts of the case are hit by the provisions of Sec. 13 - exemption allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:54:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>