<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 64 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1303</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value is the normal basis for customs assessment and cannot be rejected unless the department establishes a recognised ground under the valuation rules showing that the price is not the real commercial transaction value. Here, the revenue failed to prove that the import price was concessional or non-commercial, and the importer supported the declared value with earlier imports at similar prices. A later import and prior market enquiry were insufficient to displace the invoice value without convincing material. The enhancement of value was therefore not legally sustainable, and the declared transaction value was to be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 64 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1303</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value is the normal basis for customs assessment and cannot be rejected unless the department establishes a recognised ground under the valuation rules showing that the price is not the real commercial transaction value. Here, the revenue failed to prove that the import price was concessional or non-commercial, and the importer supported the declared value with earlier imports at similar prices. A later import and prior market enquiry were insufficient to displace the invoice value without convincing material. The enhancement of value was therefore not legally sustainable, and the declared transaction value was to be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>