<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to lack of new tangible material and being based on a mere change of opinion. The revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of royalty amount was also dismissed. The reassessment was deemed invalid, following precedents emphasizing the necessity of new material for reassessment. The decision was pronounced on 18.11.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:55:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to lack of new tangible material and being based on a mere change of opinion. The revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of royalty amount was also dismissed. The reassessment was deemed invalid, following precedents emphasizing the necessity of new material for reassessment. The decision was pronounced on 18.11.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>