<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 29 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268725</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The disallowance of expenses under sections 37 and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was upheld due to the absence of bills/vouchers. However, the claim of depreciation was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of a previous judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:55:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 29 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268725</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The disallowance of expenses under sections 37 and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was upheld due to the absence of bills/vouchers. However, the claim of depreciation was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of a previous judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>