<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 23 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268719</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer due to deficiencies in the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision-making process. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding additions to income from agricultural activities, rejection of improvement expenses claim, and arbitrary additions were acknowledged. The tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough and evidence-based assessment to prevent arbitrary conclusions and ensure a fair determination of tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 23 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268719</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer due to deficiencies in the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision-making process. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding additions to income from agricultural activities, rejection of improvement expenses claim, and arbitrary additions were acknowledged. The tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough and evidence-based assessment to prevent arbitrary conclusions and ensure a fair determination of tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>