<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 8 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing CTC Tea Processing Machines, claimed exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. for machines used in the plantation sector for cutting tea leaves. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim, supported by user certificates, and disagreed with the adjudicating authority&#039;s observations. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues, stayed recovery, and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:33:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 8 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing CTC Tea Processing Machines, claimed exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. for machines used in the plantation sector for cutting tea leaves. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim, supported by user certificates, and disagreed with the adjudicating authority&#039;s observations. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues, stayed recovery, and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>