<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268703</link>
    <description>The case involved issues of failure to obtain permission under Rule 16B of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for clearing goods for rolling on a job work basis. The Commissioner eventually granted permission after initial rejection, leading to the dismissal of appeals filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing that the permission was granted within the required timeframe, validating the clearances made during the pendency of the permission decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268703</link>
      <description>The case involved issues of failure to obtain permission under Rule 16B of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for clearing goods for rolling on a job work basis. The Commissioner eventually granted permission after initial rejection, leading to the dismissal of appeals filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing that the permission was granted within the required timeframe, validating the clearances made during the pendency of the permission decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>