<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 6 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268702</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the claim of inadmissible Cenvat credit availed by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the importance of specific and cogent evidence in such cases, highlighting the need for a strong legal basis for confirming demands of this nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 6 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268702</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the claim of inadmissible Cenvat credit availed by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the importance of specific and cogent evidence in such cases, highlighting the need for a strong legal basis for confirming demands of this nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>