<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 29 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1297</link>
    <description>Unretracted statements of employees recorded under section 14, together with stock verification based on the assessee&#039;s own declaration, sustained the duty demand on 120 MT of MS square bars, along with confiscation and penalties against the manufacturer. The contemporaneous overtime and salary records were given no evidentiary weight, and the assessee could not recharacterise the verification as mere eye estimation. By contrast, the manager&#039;s penalty was set aside because he was only an employee acting under the manufacturer&#039;s instructions, so punitive liability was not justified on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 29 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1297</link>
      <description>Unretracted statements of employees recorded under section 14, together with stock verification based on the assessee&#039;s own declaration, sustained the duty demand on 120 MT of MS square bars, along with confiscation and penalties against the manufacturer. The contemporaneous overtime and salary records were given no evidentiary weight, and the assessee could not recharacterise the verification as mere eye estimation. By contrast, the manager&#039;s penalty was set aside because he was only an employee acting under the manufacturer&#039;s instructions, so punitive liability was not justified on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>