<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 78 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Original Authority, confirming the demand for duty, confiscation of medical equipment, and imposition of fines and penalties. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that actions for violations of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. could be taken even after its rescission, and Diagnostic Centres were not entitled to the benefits of the said notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 78 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Original Authority, confirming the demand for duty, confiscation of medical equipment, and imposition of fines and penalties. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that actions for violations of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. could be taken even after its rescission, and Diagnostic Centres were not entitled to the benefits of the said notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>