<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 930 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175647</link>
    <description>The High Court did not decide the jurisdictional preliminary objection on merits and instead directed the Designated Authority to hear the petitioners and decide its own jurisdiction within the stipulated time, on or before 07.05.2009. The petition was then permitted to be withdrawn and was disposed of accordingly, with an express direction that all parties&#039; legal and factual rights and contentions would remain open for consideration before the appropriate authority or forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:05:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 930 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175647</link>
      <description>The High Court did not decide the jurisdictional preliminary objection on merits and instead directed the Designated Authority to hear the petitioners and decide its own jurisdiction within the stipulated time, on or before 07.05.2009. The petition was then permitted to be withdrawn and was disposed of accordingly, with an express direction that all parties&#039; legal and factual rights and contentions would remain open for consideration before the appropriate authority or forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>