https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175645 The Chief Justice's constitutional control over High Court staff includes the power of appointment, regulation of service conditions, suspension, and dismissal; the dismissal was therefore within his authority. The enquiry into charges could lawfully be entrusted to another Judge because the function was administrative, and obtaining a report did not amount to impermissible delegation of the decision-making power; the dismissal was not vitiated on that ground. Prior consultation with the State Public Service Commission under article 320(3)(c) was held inapplicable to High Court staff, who are under the Chief Justice's administrative control rather than the State Government's. The challenge to the dismissal therefore failed on all substantive grounds. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:52:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175645 The Chief Justice's constitutional control over High Court staff includes the power of appointment, regulation of service conditions, suspension, and dismissal; the dismissal was therefore within his authority. The enquiry into charges could lawfully be entrusted to another Judge because the function was administrative, and obtaining a report did not amount to impermissible delegation of the decision-making power; the dismissal was not vitiated on that ground. Prior consultation with the State Public Service Commission under article 320(3)(c) was held inapplicable to High Court staff, who are under the Chief Justice's administrative control rather than the State Government's. The challenge to the dismissal therefore failed on all substantive grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175645