<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. It ruled that the agreements between Siri Labs/Siri and TTKHL were on a principal-to-principal basis. The Tribunal determined that the transaction value should be based on the price agreed upon between Siri Labs/Siri and TTKHL. It found no mutuality of interest warranting the rejection of the transaction value and no grounds for invoking the extended period for demand or imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order. It ruled that the agreements between Siri Labs/Siri and TTKHL were on a principal-to-principal basis. The Tribunal determined that the transaction value should be based on the price agreed upon between Siri Labs/Siri and TTKHL. It found no mutuality of interest warranting the rejection of the transaction value and no grounds for invoking the extended period for demand or imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>