<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1485 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268676</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the COD application to condone the delay of 124 days in filing an appeal due to financial hardship. Despite the respondent&#039;s challenge to the appellant&#039;s preparedness and authenticity of financial state, the tribunal considered the provisional statement of affairs and bank statement as evidence. Emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities, the tribunal accepted the satisfactory cause shown for the delay, leading to the condonation of the delay and allowing the appeal to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1485 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268676</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the COD application to condone the delay of 124 days in filing an appeal due to financial hardship. Despite the respondent&#039;s challenge to the appellant&#039;s preparedness and authenticity of financial state, the tribunal considered the provisional statement of affairs and bank statement as evidence. Emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities, the tribunal accepted the satisfactory cause shown for the delay, leading to the condonation of the delay and allowing the appeal to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>