https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268675 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the dropping of a service tax demand, upholding a previous decision in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal found that the service tax liability had been appropriately discharged through an appointed agent, as evidenced by the respondent's actions in promoting products and handling payments. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, concluding that the appeal lacked merit and affirming the proper discharge of the service tax liability through the appointed agent. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:04:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268675 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the dropping of a service tax demand, upholding a previous decision in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal found that the service tax liability had been appropriately discharged through an appointed agent, as evidenced by the respondent's actions in promoting products and handling payments. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, concluding that the appeal lacked merit and affirming the proper discharge of the service tax liability through the appointed agent. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268675