<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1479 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal setting aside penalties under Sections 75A and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) invoked Section 80 to waive penalties due to confusion regarding the liability for service tax on MICR services, leading to the payment of service tax and interest without wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The Tribunal found the penalty under Section 78 not applicable in this case, affirming the decision to set it aside and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1479 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal setting aside penalties under Sections 75A and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) invoked Section 80 to waive penalties due to confusion regarding the liability for service tax on MICR services, leading to the payment of service tax and interest without wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The Tribunal found the penalty under Section 78 not applicable in this case, affirming the decision to set it aside and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>