<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1474 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the transaction value should not be rejected solely because the sale price was below the cost of production. It found no evidence of extra commercial considerations influencing the pricing, distinguishing the case from precedent involving selling at a loss to penetrate the market. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, granted a stay on recovery, and allowed the stay application due to the appellant having a prima facie case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1474 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the transaction value should not be rejected solely because the sale price was below the cost of production. It found no evidence of extra commercial considerations influencing the pricing, distinguishing the case from precedent involving selling at a loss to penetrate the market. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, granted a stay on recovery, and allowed the stay application due to the appellant having a prima facie case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>