https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175636 Quota rules for a blended service were construed to apply to all substantive vacancies in the cadre, including temporary posts. Protected promotee appointments made under struck-down provisions could not be excluded from quota computation, because that would deny direct recruits their share in those vacancies. Direct recruitment under Rule 6 was held to be a fixed 15% quota, not a mere ceiling, and the pre-1996 proviso was not read as limiting that entitlement to 15% of permanent strength alone. Vacancy carry-forward was accepted only to the limited extent permitted by Rule 8(2) and the earlier directions in Srikant Tripathi. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175636 Quota rules for a blended service were construed to apply to all substantive vacancies in the cadre, including temporary posts. Protected promotee appointments made under struck-down provisions could not be excluded from quota computation, because that would deny direct recruits their share in those vacancies. Direct recruitment under Rule 6 was held to be a fixed 15% quota, not a mere ceiling, and the pre-1996 proviso was not read as limiting that entitlement to 15% of permanent strength alone. Vacancy carry-forward was accepted only to the limited extent permitted by Rule 8(2) and the earlier directions in Srikant Tripathi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175636