https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175635 Revision interference was declined on the findings regarding average selling rate and the brick kiln's operational period because those conclusions rested on appreciation of evidence and were not shown to be perverse or legally untenable. However, the gross production estimate based on a 25-day round was set aside because it departed from earlier orders in the assessee's own case, where a 35-day period had been treated as reasonable, without any recorded change in the kiln's condition, capacity, or dimensions. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration on that limited production issue. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:49:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175635 Revision interference was declined on the findings regarding average selling rate and the brick kiln's operational period because those conclusions rested on appreciation of evidence and were not shown to be perverse or legally untenable. However, the gross production estimate based on a 25-day round was set aside because it departed from earlier orders in the assessee's own case, where a 35-day period had been treated as reasonable, without any recorded change in the kiln's condition, capacity, or dimensions. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration on that limited production issue. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 11 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175635