<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1465 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268656</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondents lacked authority to demand anti-dumping duty on goods imported under Tariff Item 70049099 as they were not covered by the notification. The demand notice and communication were deemed unauthorized, quashed, and set aside. The petition was allowed, declaring the respondents&#039; actions as without jurisdiction or legal authority. The court made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1465 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268656</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondents lacked authority to demand anti-dumping duty on goods imported under Tariff Item 70049099 as they were not covered by the notification. The demand notice and communication were deemed unauthorized, quashed, and set aside. The petition was allowed, declaring the respondents&#039; actions as without jurisdiction or legal authority. The court made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>