<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268649</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly and cannot be extended by analogy to goods not expressly covered by its terms. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. and condition 28B, which related to zinc metal, was held inapplicable to imported reprocessed palladium catalyst. The declared value was also rejected, and re-determination on the basis of contemporary import data under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 was upheld as proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268649</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly and cannot be extended by analogy to goods not expressly covered by its terms. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. and condition 28B, which related to zinc metal, was held inapplicable to imported reprocessed palladium catalyst. The declared value was also rejected, and re-determination on the basis of contemporary import data under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 was upheld as proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>