<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1449 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04, setting aside the orders under section 263 and restoring the AO&#039;s original orders. However, the appeal for A.Y. 2004-05 was dismissed as the order under section 263 was not challenged, and the AO&#039;s consequential order followed the CIT&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1449 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04, setting aside the orders under section 263 and restoring the AO&#039;s original orders. However, the appeal for A.Y. 2004-05 was dismissed as the order under section 263 was not challenged, and the AO&#039;s consequential order followed the CIT&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>