<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1448 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Rs. 65,00,000 was not considered rent under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, the provisions of TDS were not applicable. The agreement between the parties was deemed to be for conducting business rather than for renting the cinema hall. As a result, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1448 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Rs. 65,00,000 was not considered rent under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, the provisions of TDS were not applicable. The agreement between the parties was deemed to be for conducting business rather than for renting the cinema hall. As a result, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>