<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the estimation of income at Rs. 91.00 crores, emphasizing that low GP alone is insufficient to estimate income and that advance tax is not indicative of final taxable income. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s estimation lacked substantial evidence of discrepancies or suppression. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the carry forward and set off of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment year 2011-12, noting that the AO&#039;s summary rejection of the books hindered a proper examination, which was later confirmed to be allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the estimation of income at Rs. 91.00 crores, emphasizing that low GP alone is insufficient to estimate income and that advance tax is not indicative of final taxable income. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s estimation lacked substantial evidence of discrepancies or suppression. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the carry forward and set off of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment year 2011-12, noting that the AO&#039;s summary rejection of the books hindered a proper examination, which was later confirmed to be allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>