<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268634</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed all seven appeals by the Revenue, upholding the allowance of deduction under S.54F for all flats received by the assessee in the development agreement. The decision clarified that a residential house could include multiple flats based on the percentage of built-up area, not the number of units received. The ITAT relied on binding precedents and judicial interpretations to support the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under S.54F for all units received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268634</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed all seven appeals by the Revenue, upholding the allowance of deduction under S.54F for all flats received by the assessee in the development agreement. The decision clarified that a residential house could include multiple flats based on the percentage of built-up area, not the number of units received. The ITAT relied on binding precedents and judicial interpretations to support the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under S.54F for all units received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>