<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1431 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s plea for rectification of the ITAT order, emphasizing that rectification is limited to correcting obvious errors, which the applicant failed to identify. The Tribunal noted that challenging the Tribunal&#039;s observations and decision-making process does not fall within the scope of rectification. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application, concluding the matter on 3.2.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1431 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s plea for rectification of the ITAT order, emphasizing that rectification is limited to correcting obvious errors, which the applicant failed to identify. The Tribunal noted that challenging the Tribunal&#039;s observations and decision-making process does not fall within the scope of rectification. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application, concluding the matter on 3.2.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>