https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1284 The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal to decide on the issue of relationship among other issues. The duty demands raised beyond the normal period on the grounds of related parties and ineligible discounts were not sustainable, and these demands and associated penalties were set aside. However, duty demands and penalties related to transactions involving dummy parties and falling within the normal period were remanded to the Commissioner for fresh quantification. The appeals were partly allowed, and the judgment was pronounced on 6-2-2007. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1284 The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal to decide on the issue of relationship among other issues. The duty demands raised beyond the normal period on the grounds of related parties and ineligible discounts were not sustainable, and these demands and associated penalties were set aside. However, duty demands and penalties related to transactions involving dummy parties and falling within the normal period were remanded to the Commissioner for fresh quantification. The appeals were partly allowed, and the judgment was pronounced on 6-2-2007. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1284