https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175625 Persons in lawful possession of structures erected on Government land with the State's permission cannot be dispossessed by executive order without authority of law. The State's claim that the dharmasala, temple and shops vested in it merely because they stood on its land was rejected, because bona fide constructions raised with permission do not automatically vest in the landowner. Even if the property was of a public charitable character, removal of the trustee or manager had to follow due legal procedure, including proceedings such as those contemplated by Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and not forcible action. The executive orders and dispossession were unlawful and infringed fundamental rights. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:47:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175625 Persons in lawful possession of structures erected on Government land with the State's permission cannot be dispossessed by executive order without authority of law. The State's claim that the dharmasala, temple and shops vested in it merely because they stood on its land was rejected, because bona fide constructions raised with permission do not automatically vest in the landowner. Even if the property was of a public charitable character, removal of the trustee or manager had to follow due legal procedure, including proceedings such as those contemplated by Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and not forcible action. The executive orders and dispossession were unlawful and infringed fundamental rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175625