https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175606 Bona fide requirement under rent control was established on oral and documentary evidence, as the authorities found that the landlady needed additional accommodation for family members and that the tenant had not displaced that need by proving adequate alternative accommodation. Comparative hardship also favoured the landlady because the tenant and his family had accommodation elsewhere, and the length of tenancy under Rule 16 did not outweigh the proved need. The Court reiterated that the landlord is the best judge of requirement and that bona fide personal need is primarily a question of fact. In the absence of any jurisdictional error or legal infirmity, interference with the concurrent findings was declined. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175606 Bona fide requirement under rent control was established on oral and documentary evidence, as the authorities found that the landlady needed additional accommodation for family members and that the tenant had not displaced that need by proving adequate alternative accommodation. Comparative hardship also favoured the landlady because the tenant and his family had accommodation elsewhere, and the length of tenancy under Rule 16 did not outweigh the proved need. The Court reiterated that the landlord is the best judge of requirement and that bona fide personal need is primarily a question of fact. In the absence of any jurisdictional error or legal infirmity, interference with the concurrent findings was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175606