<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1415 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268606</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was treated as admissible for technical testing and analysis services used in relation to exported goods where the testing was required under the buyer&#039;s written agreement and the service fell within the notification. Refund was also treated as admissible for wharfage charges under port services because the invoices were issued by the port trust, showed service tax separately, and identified the assessee, with port services specifically covered by the notification. The document states that the refund claim was covered for both categories of services and that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1415 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268606</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was treated as admissible for technical testing and analysis services used in relation to exported goods where the testing was required under the buyer&#039;s written agreement and the service fell within the notification. Refund was also treated as admissible for wharfage charges under port services because the invoices were issued by the port trust, showed service tax separately, and identified the assessee, with port services specifically covered by the notification. The document states that the refund claim was covered for both categories of services and that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>